Commercial Dispute Resolution case commentary roundup
The Hardwicke CDR team produce regular case commentaries of which the following are the most recent:
- Khandapour v Chambers – rights to appropriation and payment obligations
- Revisiting Goldman Sachs v Banco Novo
- Matthew & Ors v Sedman & Ors – limitation periods after midnight deadlines
- Samba Financial Group v Byers – the same or substantially the same facts under CPR 17.4(2)
- Schettini v Silvestri – appealing undertakings in damages
- Michael Wilson Partners v Emmott – frozen assets v business as usual: where to draw the line
- Gama Aviation (UK) Ltd v Taleveras Petroleum Trading – security for costs and relief from sanctions
- McDonald v Rose – permission to appeal from lower and appeal courts: one timeline or two?
- General Dynamics UK Ltd v State of Libya – service on a sovereign state
- SPI North Ltd v Swiss Post International (UK) Ltd – when is a defendant actually unable to admit or deny a pleaded allegation?
- W Nagel v Pluczenik Diamond Co NV – commercial agents and the commodities market exception
If you would like further information, please contact Sally Wollaston.
You can also sign up for our mailings here.
