Swallow Security Services Ltd v Rosemary Millicent

19 Mar 2009

Area(s) of Law :
Employment Law
Court : Employment Appeal Tribunal
Source :
Date : 19-03-2009

Case Summary By :
David Lewis


UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Contributory fault

The employers dismissed the employee after a bogus redundancy exercise, after she had knowingly taken paid holiday in excess of her holiday allowance and failed to apologise. The Tribunal found that she had been unfairly dismissed, of its own volition raised Polkey but did not raise or consider contributory fault which the employers, who were unrepresented, did not raise themselves.


Held on appeal

1. The Employment Tribunal, having found that there was conduct on the part of the employee that was or could be regarded as blameworthy, were bound by s123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) to consider contributory fault.

2. Were that not so, the employers would not be permitted, following the principles in Rance, to raise the issue for the first time on appeal.

Appeal allowed; remitted to same Tribunal for consideration of contributory fault.

For Full Report:

EAT Link: https://www.gov.uk/courts-tribunals/employment-appeal-tribunal

Bailii Link: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0297_08_1903.html


This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.


Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Gatehouse Chambers. However, if you have any other queries about this content please contact: