Disguised DBAs? CAT considers LFAs post-PACCAR (Alex Neill Class Representative Ltd v Sony)
Dispute resolution analysis: this is the first judgment from the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) considering the recent Supreme Court decision in R (PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others (‘PACCAR’). A revised litigation funding agreement (‘LFA’) for opt-out proceedings was approved by the CAT, because it was held not to be a damages-based agreement (‘DBA’).
Read the full article on the LexisNexis website.
Written by Charlotte Wilk.
Disclaimer
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.
Contact
Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Gatehouse Chambers. However, if you have any other queries about this content please contact:
