Property case law update: March 2011

04 Mar 2011

Rosebery Limited v Rocklee Limited & Eaglestone – 20.1.11 – unreported – Mr N Strauss QC
Leases – Ownership of airspace above roof or roof terraces – No presumption airspace demised for leases generally – Matter of construction – Relevance of subsequent conduct to construction of lease.

Stonham v Ramrattan & anr [2011] EWCA Civ 119 – 16.2.11
Matrimonial home –Sham transfer – Bankruptcy of transferor – s283A Insolvency Act 1986 – Commencement of Trustee’s time limit – Entitlement under void transaction – Property vested in a third party on date of bankruptcy not a part of the bankrupt’s estate on that date.

Manchester CC v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 – 9.2.11
Appeal against order for Possession – Abolition of tolerated trespassers – Demoted tenancy – Effect of dismissal of Appeal on defendant’s status – Application to vary date for delivery up under original order for possession SC power to set aside possession order and make a substitute order for possession.

Campbell & Campbell v Banks  [2011] EWCA Civ 61 – 1.2.11
Section 62 Law of Property Act 1925 – Two parcels of land formerly in common ownership – Easement claimed over one for benefit of the other – Occupied by different tenants when two parcels first separated – No evidence of actual enjoyment of the “right” by the dominant tenement at date separate titles created – s62 not operative in the absence of such evidence.

Knights Construction (March) Limited v Roberto Mac Limited & the Chief Land Registrar – Mr Marks, Adjudicator to HMLR – Ref 2009/1459 – 9.2.11
Rectification of the Register – Schedule 4 LRA 2003 – Meaning of “correcting a mistake” – Registered proprietor registered by mistake – Subsequent transactions by registered proprietor capable of rectification – Comprehensive review of authorities.

Case summaries by Michelle Stevens-Hoare


This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.


Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Gatehouse Chambers. However, if you have any other queries about this content please contact: