R (Gopikrishna) v The Office of the Independent Adjudicator [2015] EWHC 207 (Admin)

10 Feb 2015

On 6 February 2014, HHJ Curran (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) allowed a claim for judicial review of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator following a three-day hearing and a 116 page judgment. David Lawson acted as Junior Counsel for the Claimant alongside Clive Newton QC, and Leon Glenister acted for three interested parties.

The Claimant was a medical student at the University of Leicester.  She did not pass her end of second year exams and brought an appeal to the university committee based on mitigating circumstances.

The University rejected the appeal and the Claimant complained to the OIA, the organisation which adjudicates on Higher Education complaints.  When the OIA rejected her complaint she brought a judicial review of the OIA’s decision.

The Court concluded:

  1. If a University refuses to re-open a student’s appeal that refusal is a “decision” about which the student can complaint to the OIA.
  2. Irrationality and procedural unfairness by a University can be determined by the OIA.  While the law prevents the OIA from considering matters of "academic judgment" (Higher Education Act 2004, section 12), these fundamental failures of a university are within the OIA scheme.
  3. The decision by the OIA was made on the basis of an error of fact (applying E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] QB 1044).

The Claimant and student interested parties were represented by Sinclairs Law.

For further information, please refer to the judgment in R (Gopikrishna) v The Office of the Independent Adjudicator [2015] EWHC 207 (Admin)


This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.


Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Gatehouse Chambers. However, if you have any other queries about this content please contact: