Practice overview
David Lewis KC has very substantial experience in commercial disputes. His broad-based commercial practice spans domestic and international litigation and arbitration as well as other forms of ADR, securities and financial services litigation, contractual disputes, directors and shareholders disputes, joint ventures and partnerships disputes, civil fraud, sales of goods and services, franchising, professional negligence, and agency (in particular commercial agency).
He is recommended by both Chambers UK and Legal 500 for commercial dispute resolution. They refer to him as "a bright and strategically creative silk" who is “incredibly impressive”. They note the fact that not only is he “an excellent advocate” but also that he is “highly user-friendly”, “down to earth, very commercial”. “When you have a difficult court case, he’s the guy you want. He really fights your corner, he’s extremely thorough and he knows his stuff”.
Recent cases:
- Revedor Malta Ltd v (1) Kazarez (2) Dockmill Capital Ltd [2025] EWHC 640 (Comm): leading Rob Hammond for the successful claimant at trial and consequentials, obtaining specific performance, s.39 SCA relief, and partial indemnity costs. Concerned the €18m sale of a yacht, engaging issues of foreign law, agency, the interaction of sanctions with the Defendant’s restoration to the Isle of Man register, and exceptions to without prejudice privilege.
- SU Consultancy Ltd v Singh & Ors [2025] EWHC 564 (Comm): leading Michael Maris: acting for the successful party at the consequentials stage, obtaining highly favourable remedies following a multi-week, multi-million pound complex High Court trial, including a substantial award of damages under a claim for unlawful means conspiracy, and an account of profits pursuant to a constructive trust.
- Advanced Multi-Technology For Medical Industry v Uniserve [2024] EWHC 1725 (Ch), leading Edward Knight; acting for the successful party (awarded circa USD 20 million) in a multi-week High Court trial involving breach of contract and claims under s50 of the Sales of Goods Act 1979, and successfully defending the counterclaim alleging allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract.
- Norman v Horton Partnership [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch), representing the successful claimant in this multi-party action, resisting amendments to add money laundering allegations. The judgment considers whether the test in the criminal case of R v Anwoir [2009] 1 WLR 980 applies to civil proceedings, and the manner in which it is to be applied.
- Patel v (1) Minerva Services Delware Inc, (2) Baxendal-Walker, (3) Slater [2024] EWHC 172 (Ch) leading William Skjott, acting for second and third defendants; a claim involving Abuse of process; Anti-arbitration injunctions; Anti-suit injunction. The central issue in the application was whether the institution of foreign (Delaware, USA) court and arbitral proceedings could found claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The court refused the claimant permission to advance claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process extending to foreign arbitral proceedings.
- La Cotte Consulting Ltd v Sovereign Steel Stockholders (A Firm) [2021] EWHC 1517: leading Jack Dillon in three-week High Court claim, conducted remotely, involving breach of confidence; breach of contract; conspiracy; dishonest assistance; joint venture agreements; and loss of profits.
- Acting for a group of institutional investors on a £100m+ claim relating to a major international company. The claim is based on "dishonest delay" under paragraph 5, Schedule 10A Financial Services & Markets Act 2000.
- £70m cross-border (UK/UAE) dispute involving alleged breach of partnership/joint venture agreement and claims of breach of fiduciary duty and lack of good faith.
- Representing the claimant in an LCIA International arbitration for breach of an investment agreement (£50m plus).
- Representing the defendants and counterclaimants in a multi-party dispute centring around unlawful means conspiracy (£5m plus).
- Representing the defendants responding to a claim in deceit for fraudulent misrepresentation brought against a company and a former director.
- Representing the claimant in secret profit claim involving diversion of a commercial opportunity by malfeasant directors (£10m).
- (1) Nicholas Christy (2) Peter Brewin v (1) Bathroom Brands Holdings Ltd, (2) Cintep development Ltd [2020] EWHC 3210 (Ch): £10m commercial chancery case relating to the breakdown of relationships between the two founders and equal shareholders.
- HH Sheikh Tahnoon Al Nehayna v Ioannis Kent [2018] EWHC 333 (Comm) & [2018] EWHC 614 (Comm), leading a junior member of chambers in a complex €22 million Commercial Court claim.
- A v B [2017] €300 LCIA International Arbitration claim for deceit, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract.
- A v B [2017] €100 million International Arbitration.
- Tube Tech International Limited Ltd v Intertek Investigation Services UK Limited (ongoing) representing the defendants in a contract dispute valued at £10-£15 million involving issues including contractual penalty clauses.
- James Rogers v Andrew Barr acting for the Claimant at trial and in relation to the taking of an account in regard to a partnership dispute [2017] EWHC 1423 (Ch)
- Beavis v ParkingEye - Supreme Court - [2015] UKSC 67 [2015] 3W.L.R 1373, representing (with others) the Appellant in his appeal to the Supreme Court relating to the penalty rule (the law relating to contractual penalties).
David Lewis KC is an accredited mediator.
David Lewis KC provides his services as a director of DL Legal Limited. Registered in England & Wales, company number 13187044. Registered office: 1 Kings Avenue, London, N21 3NA. Both David and the company are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.




Areas of expertise
- Commercial dispute resolution
- Commercial litigation
Commercial litigation
David has extensive experience in commercial disputes. His wide-ranging commercial practice spans domestic and international litigation and arbitration as well as other forms of ADR, contractual disputes, directors and shareholders disputes, joint ventures and partnerships disputes, civil fraud, sales of goods and services, franchising, professional negligence, agency, and interlocutory applications e.g. for freezing relief, specific performance, and proprietary remedies. He has particular expertise in relation to unfair prejudice petitions.
David has comprehensive experience in franchising, representing both franchisors and franchisees, as well as of commercial agency disputes, acting for both agents and principals operating in a wide variety of industries including fashion, leisure, aerospace, homeware, garden, food and beverage, furniture, sports, security, transport industries.
Recent Work:
- Advanced Multi-Technology For Medical Industry v Uniserve [2024] EWHC 1725 (Ch), leading Edward Knight; acting for the successful party (awarded circa USD 20 million) in a multi-week High Court trial involving breach of contract and claims under s50 of the Sales of Goods Act 1979, and successfully defending the counterclaim alleging allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract.
- Patel v (1) Minerva Services Delware Inc, (2) Baxendal-Walker, (3) Slater [2024] EWHC 172 (Ch) leading William Skjott, acting for second and third defendants; a claim involving Abuse of process; Anti-arbitration injunctions; Anti-suit injunction. The central issue in the application was whether the institution of foreign (Delaware, USA) court and arbitral proceedings could found claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The court refused the claimant permission to advance claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process extending to foreign arbitral proceedings.
- SU Consultancy Ltd v Singh & Ors [2024] EWHC 1596 (Comm), leading Michael Maris: acting for the successful party in a multi-week multi-million pound complex High Court trial involving a claim for unlawful means conspiracy; deceit and the inducement of breach of contract; passing off; trespass; breach of confidence; restoration of assets under a constructive trust; and authority in the context of de facto directors’ status for the purposes of a quorum.
- La Cotte Consulting Ltd v Sovereign Steel Stockholders (A Firm) [2021] EWHC 1517: leading Jack Dillon in three-week High Court claim, conducted remotely, involving breach of confidence; breach of contract; conspiracy; dishonest assistance; joint venture agreements; and loss of profits.
- Acting for a group of institutional investors on a £100m+ claim relating to a major international company. The claim is based on “dishonest delay” under paragraph 5, Schedule 10A Financial Services & Markets Act 2000.
- £70m cross-border (UK/UAE) dispute involving alleged breach of partnership/joint venture agreement and claims of breach of fiduciary duty and lack of good faith.
- (1) Nicholas Christy (2) Peter Brewin v (1) Bathroom Brands Holdings Ltd, (2) Cintep development Ltd [2020] EWHC 3210 (Ch): £10m commercial chancery case relating to the breakdown of relationships between the two founders and equal shareholders.
- Tube Tech International Limited Ltd v Intertek Investigation Services UK Limited QB: acting in a claim values at £10-£15 million for breach of contract involving issues of contractual penalty clauses.
- Complex and high value fraud claim relating to breach of non-compete restrictive covenants in business sale agreement.
- La Cotte Consulting Ltd v Sovereign Steel: £ multi-million fraud claim involving allegations of deceit/misrepresentation, mistake, unlawful means conspiracy, procuring breach of contract and breach of good faith. The issues involve questions of limitation, laches, agency, legal and equitable assignments.
- £10m unfair prejudice petition against a major UK corporate.
- HH Sheikh Tahnoon Al Nehayna v Ioannis Kent (€22 ) [2018] EWHC 333 (Comm) & [2018] EWHC 614 (Comm): leading a junior member of chambers in a complex €22 million Commercial Court claim.
- A v B €300 million LCIA International Arbitration acting for the claimant in a claim for deceit, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract.
- A v B €100m LCIA International Arbitration acting for the claimant in sizeable contractual dispute.
- Certus Capital Limited v Publity AG HC (QB): representing the claimant in a £15 million contractual dispute relating introducers fees involving issues of construction, estoppel and quantum meruit and German law.
- Kumho Ltd v Chemiculture Ltd: £ multi-million claim in relation to damages relating to the supply of defective goods.
- ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 [2015] 3 W.L.R 1373: representing (with others) the Appellant in their appeal to the Supreme Court relating to the penalty rule (the law relating to contractual penalties).
- Malcolm Harrison v (1) Sir John Madejski (2) Coys of Kensington (A Firm) [2014] EWCA Civ 361: representing the appellant in an appeal regarding issues of unjust enrichment, restitution and market value for services.
- Rossetti Marketing Limited v Diamond Sofa Company Limited [2013] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 308: representing the claimant in this Commercial Agency Regulations appeal.
- Invicta UK (a partnership) v International Brands Limited [2013] EWHC 1564 (QB): representing the claimant in this Commercial Agency Regulations Case, which is not the leading domestic authority determining the point in time at which the court assesses whether an agent falls within the scope of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993.
- Travel & Holidays LLC v Hajj Charter Ltd [2013] EWHC 4334 (Comm): variation of a freeing order.
- Nutritek in VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 808: representing the First Defendant in this 5 day Court of Appeal case involving allegations of fraud (value circa $300 million) and piercing the corporate veil.
- Banking & finance
Banking & finance
David has wide-ranging experience in securities and financial services litigation.
Recent work
- Acting for a group of institutional investors on a £100m+ claim relating to a major international company. The claim is based on “dishonest delay” under paragraph 5, Schedule 10A Financial Services & Markets Act 2000.
- A number of related claims for a major financial institution relating to s452 Companies Act and an unfair prejudice petition.
- Advising and representing a group of claimants in their claim for damages against parties unlawfully promoting a Collective Investment Scheme (sections 138D & 241 FSMA).
- Advising and representing in relation to an action for damages resulting from breach of the Conduct of Business Rules.
- Advising in relation to breach of the general prohibition by unlawfully carrying on a regulated activity by accepting deposits and/or arranging deals in investments.
- Civil fraud & asset tracing
Civil fraud & asset tracing
David has considerable experience of civil fraud claims acting for individuals and corporates including multi-party, international disputes where conflicts of law and questions of jurisdiction are commonplace. His expertise includes claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent misrepresentation, deceit and secret profits, conspiracy, knowing receipt, unjust enrichment and breach of trust.
Recent Work:
- SU Consultancy Ltd v Singh & Ors [2024] EWHC 1596 (Comm), leading Michael Maris: acting for the successful party in a multi-week multi-million pound complex High Court trial involving a claim for unlawful means conspiracy; deceit and the inducement of breach of contract; passing off; trespass; breach of confidence; restoration of assets under a constructive trust; and authority in the context of de facto directors’ status for the purposes of a quorum.
- La Cotte Consulting Ltd v Sovereign Steel Stockholders (A Firm) [2021] EWHC 1517: leading Jack Dillon in three-week High Court claim, conducted remotely, involving breach of confidence; breach of contract; conspiracy; dishonest assistance; joint venture agreements; and loss of profits.
- Acting for a group of institutional investors on a £100m+ claim relating to a major international company. The claim is based on “dishonest delay” under paragraph 5, Schedule 10A Financial Services & Markets Act 2000.
- Amicrest Plc v Yorke Starkey & Vlodzimierz Lopian, Parkers Property Management Ltd: High value claim relating to alleged secret profits complicated by the malfeasant directors’ control of the company.
- Dark Land Fitness Ltd & Ors v Jan Spaticchia & energie Direct Franchising Ltd & energie Global Brand: a group of claims brought against the first defendant relating to fraudulent misrepresentation which induced various claimants to become energie fit4less franchisees.
- La Cotte Consulting Ltd v Sovereign Steel: claims of fraud (deceit/misrepresentation), mistake, unlawful means conspiracy, procuring breaches of contract and breach of the duty of good faith.
- £ multi-million dispute relating to the misappropriation of funds and IP following a major business sale.
- A v B: acting for the Claimants in a multi million pound claim concerning allegations of deceit and breach of duty causing parties to invest in a tax mitigation scheme.
- A v B: €300 million LCIA International Arbitration claim for deceit, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract.
- Bicester GP Ltd and ors v Breen and ors [2017] HC (Comm) representing one of the defendants, defending a claim for £8m against allegations of deceit, unlawful means conspiracy, constructive trust, money had received and unjust enrichment.
- A v B [2016] acting for the putative defendant defending allegations of deceit, knowing receipt, conspiracy and misfeasance, centring around investment in an extremely prestigious property development in London.
- A v B [2015] represented the Claimant as leading counsel in this claim regarding the sale of a shareholding procured by deceit and unlawful means conspiracy.
- Nutritek in VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 808 represented the First Defendant in a 5 day appeal before the Court of Appeal involving allegations of fraud, value £300 million.
- Commercial arbitration
Commercial arbitration
David is experienced in domestic and international arbitration including CIS work, fraud, commercial disputes, shareholder actions and partnership disputes.
- A v B: advising on and ad hoc arbitration regarding breach of contract and professional negligence.
- C v D: €300 million LCIA International Arbitration claim for deceit, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract.
- X v Y: $100 million LCIA International Arbitration claim arising out of breach of contract and breach of trust.
- E v F: acting for the claimant involving allegations of breach of a partnership agreement relating to a partnership formed in the CIS.
- G v H: LCIA Arbitration representing the claimant (Cypriot company) in its claim £1.5 million claim against a major corporate for breach of contract.
- K v L: representing a fashion house defending allegations of misrepresentation and breach of contract.
- M v N: representing the Claimant in a commercial agency arbitration.
- Franchising
Franchising
David Lewis KC is a very experienced commercial litigator and head of the Gatehouse Chambers Commercial Dispute and International Dispute teams.
Highly regarded within the franchising arena and consequently regularly instructed by franchise specialist solicitors, for more than 18 years David has specialised in franchising acting for both franchisors and franchisees, securing regular instruction from well-known franchisors operating in the fitness and leisure, domiciliary care, logistics and education sectors.
David has significant experience in a wide range of franchising matters, including advice on, pursuing or defending interim injunctive proceedings regarding breach of post termination restrictive covenants, springboard injunctions, delivery up, and ‘step-in’; claims for misrepresentation (contractual and tortious), negligence / duty of care; economic torts and restitutionary remedies; and on the non-contentious side, advising on and editing franchise and master franchise agreements.
Recent Work:
- Dark Land Fitness Ltd & Ors v Jan Spaticchia & energie Direct Franchising Ltd & energie Global Brand: a group of claims brought against the first defendant relating to fraudulent misrepresentation which induced various claimants to become energie fit4less franchisees.
- X v Y (ongoing – High Court): defending claims brought by the principals for deceit (fraudulent misrepresentation) and breach of contract.
- X v Y (ongoing – High Court): defending claims brought by the franchisee and the principals for deceit (fraudulent misrepresentation) and breach of contract.
- X v Y (ongoing – High Court (commercial court) trial on November 2020): defending a claim for declaratory relief and counterclaiming breach of contract, injunctive relief, delivery up and inducement to breach contract.
- X v Y (ongoing – pre-action): advising the proposed defendant on an intimated claim for misrepresentation, breach of contract and breach of the Trading Schemes Act 1996.
- X v Y (pre-action arbitration): advising an ex-franchisee (of multiple franchises) on claims for misrepresentation and breach of contract.
- Companies, joint ventures & partnerships
Companies, joint ventures & partnerships
David is frequently called upon to advise and represent partners, partnerships, joint venturers and joint ventures in all manner and scales of dispute.
David acts regularly in company disputes including unfair prejudice petitions under 994 of the Companies Act 2006 and just and equitable petitions and the removal of directors under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 and has experience in Derivative claims.
Recent Work:
- La Cotte Consulting Ltd v Sovereign Steel Stockholders (A Firm) [2021] EWHC 1517: leading Jack Dillon in three-week High Court claim, conducted remotely, involving breach of confidence; breach of contract; conspiracy; dishonest assistance; joint venture agreements; and loss of profits.
- Christy & Anor v Bathroom Brands Holdings Ltd & Cintep: £10m unfair prejudice petition against a major UK corporate.
- Amicrest plc v Yorke Starkey & Vlodzimierz Lipian, Parkers Property Management Ltd: major secret profit claim complicated by the malfeasant directors’ control of the company.
- A number of related claims for a major financial institution relating to s452 Companies Act and an unfair prejudice petition.
- £10m unfair prejudice petition relating to the alleged mis-management of a business set up to develop a revolutionary air flushed toilet system.
- Re Midland Resources Holdings Limited: instructed to assist local advocate in a petition under the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008.
- HH Sheikh Tahnoon Al Nehayna v Ioannis Kent [2018] EWHC 333 (Comm) & [2018] EWHC 614 (Comm), a €15 million Commercial Court claim involving economic and physical duress, blackmail, implied duty of good, partnership and joint venture relationships.
- Re A Partnership: acted in a Partnership dispute relating, inter alia, to the application of s42 of the Partnership Act.
- James Rogers v Andrew Barr [2017] EWHC 1423 (Ch) acted for the claimant in this matter con concerning the formation of a partnership and the contentious taking of an account.
- A v B: €300 million LCIA International Arbitration regarding allegations of partnership, deceit, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract.
- The Northampton Regional Livestock Centre Company Ltd v Cowling & Ors [2013] EWHC 1720 (QB), [2014] EWHC 30 (QB), [2015] EWCA Civ 651 acting for one defendant in this claim relating to agency, partnership and breach of fiduciary duty, and vicarious liability and the application of s10 of the Partnership Act “ordinary course of business”.
- Re A (ongoing) acting in a section 994 petition in which a quasi-partnership is alleged, regarding allegation of unfair prejudice on grounds of breach of fiduciary duty and diversion of assets.
- Employment & executive disputes
Employment & executive disputes
David’s employment law expertise focuses on High Court executive disputes quite often related to directors and shareholders disputes, but also includes claims for and against employees and directors for breach of fiduciary duty, misfeasance, breach of trust, proprietary claims and conflicts of interests. He has considerable experience in applying for and resisting injunctions for breach of covenants, infringement of fiduciary and confidentiality duties and freezing orders.
Recent Work:
- A v B (ongoing) David represents the co-founder and the former Chief Marketing Officer of the Respondent company in his whistleblowing claim.
- A v B, David represents the company in its claim against an ex-employee who misappropriated funds.
- A v B David represented the founder of a company and former director and shareholder in his claims for deferred consideration due under a Share Purchase Agreement, breach of contract, and his related employment claims for unfair dismissal.
- A v B in which David represented the company in its claim for breach of Directors duty, freezing and proprietary relief, and recovery of money had and received allegedly misappropriated by a senior employee.
- Private international law
Private international law
David has experience of cases involving private international law issues.
For example:
- Jurisdiction arise (including under the Recast Brussels Regulation), and injunctions in support of foreign proceedings (under section 25 Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982). He is also regularly involved in multi-jurisdictional disputes, involving complex jurisdictional issues or concurrent foreign proceedings or where the substantive law of the English proceedings is not English law. Examples include: Nutritek in VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 808 in which David (with others) representing the First Defendant in this 5 day Court of Appeal case involving allegations of fraud (value circa $300 million) and piercing the corporate veil/
- A v B in which it was contended that Ukrainian law applied.
- Certus Capital Limited v Publity AG HC [2016] (QB) which involved the application of the German law (the Commercial Code).
- Commercial litigation
- International
International
David’s expertise in commercial dispute resolution, both litigation and arbitration, gives him considerable experience of disputes involving international parties and overseas jurisdictions in relation to all the areas of his practice.
He has handled disputes involving a wide variety of jurisdictions including the Middle East and Europe.
Directory recommendations
David is recommended by Chambers UK, Chambers Global and the Legal 500 for commercial dispute resolution.
- “David is a strong commercial litigator. He is efficient with his work and delivers his advice directly and in a helpful and straightforward way. His advocacy is robust and very competent.” (The Legal 500, 2024, Commercial Litigation)
- “David has a rare combination of great intellectual and legal ability, and a real willingness to work with his instructing solicitors as seamlessly as possible. Even as a senior, David is prepared to roll up his sleeves and be part of a larger team.” (The Legal 500, 2024, Fraud: Civil)
- “David Lewis is an incredible, highly persuasive advocate, whose written work is clear and concise.” (Chambers and Partners, Commercial Dispute Resolution)
- “Builds strong relationships with clients and provides pragmatic advice.” (Chambers Global, 2023)
- “David is an excellent advocate. He is commercially focused, practical and mindful of the context of the claim in any negotiations.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
- “A barrister who can see the architecture of a case early on. He takes complex litigation and makes it easy to manage.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
- “He is extremely knowledgeable, creative, strategically very strong and very tenacious.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
- “David’s advocacy is a thing of surgical precision, he is fabulous with client and gives clear strategic advice from the outset.” (The Legal 500)
- “David is determined and dogmatic, and offers great tactical insight.” “His advocacy is persuasive, and he can hold his ground in areas with which he isn’t familiar.” (Chambers UK)
- “A bright and strategically creative silk.” (The Legal 500)
- “Down-to-earth, very commercial and an excellent advocate.” “He’s very good at establishing his arguments and can read judges very well.” (Chambers UK)
- He “combines astonishing turnaround time with excellent quality of work. He explains complex issues very clearly to clients and grasps detail quickly. He is impressive on his feet.” (Chambers UK)
- “He is very bright, highly proactive and really on your side.” Chambers UK
- “Very easy to work with and the lay clients love his punchy style.” (The Legal 500)
- “Really prepared to get stuck in and is blessed with the art of persuasion.” (Chambers UK)
- “David adopts a determined approach and has great tactical insight. His experience and input are highly valued. He is certainly someone you want on your team rather than on the other side.”(Chambers UK)
- “Confident, intelligent and robust. You know he is fighting your corner” (The Legal 500)
Professional associations
- Commercial Bar Association
- London Common Law and Commercial Bar Association
- London Court of International Arbitration
- Employment Lawyers Association
Qualifications
- LL.B Hons
- ADR Group Accredited Civil & Commercial Mediator
- Registered Legal Practitioner, Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC)