Dr. Robert Whittock

Areas of expertise

• Intellectual property

  Intellectual property

  Robert’s practice covers all areas of Intellectual Property, including trade marks, designs, copyright and confidential information.  He has a particular interest in patents concerning specialty chemicals and pharmaceuticals.

  In addition to his work at the Bar, he also spent two years in the IP/IT department at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP where he worked on both non-contentious and contentious IP matters including multi-jurisdictional patent litigation concerning extended wear contact lenses (Novartis v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 1039). As part of this involvement, he observed witnessed experiments in the US concerning the manufacture and testing of extended wear contact lenses.

  Prior to commencing practice Robert obtained a PhD in synthetic organic chemistry concerning the synthesis, characterisation and measurement of the physical properties of new photochromic compounds.

  Following his PhD studies he was a scientist in the pharmaceutical industry for six years, predominantly at AstraZeneca, where he gained a broad experience of the pharmaceutical research and development process from early lead identification to Phase III clinical trials.

  He is a named inventor, has researched the solid state chemistry (polymorphs, hydrates and salts) of many candidate drugs including AstraZeneca’s Brillinta, Brilique (Ticagrelor, AZD6140) an oral anti-platelet for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes and has undertaken and supervised patent infringement testing of both drug substances and drug products.

  He has presented and chaired sessions at numerous international conferences concerning the identification of suitable solid state forms for use as the pharmaceutical drug and pharmaceutical patents in respect of the same, including at Assa International IWPCPS-13 and IQPC Developing IP Strategies for Crystalline Forms 2010.

  Recent Work:

  • Kupros Ltd. v Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Energy, Commerce, Industry and Tourism [2017] – Drafted skeleton argument opposing the opposition to the applicant’s UK trade mark applications for ANGLOUMI and ANGLUMI under s.5(2)(b) and s.5(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 relying upon the earlier UK trade mark HALLOUMI. Case settled prior to hearing.
  • Willow Automotive Limited v Colin Nash [2015] Cancellation No 9012C (INVALIDITY), OHIM: advised and drafted observations in response to allegations of bad faith in making a community trade mark application.
  • Nduka v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks [2013] EWHC 2193 (Ch): appeal to the High Court from UK Intellectual Property Office in relation to a patent application for a biomedical device.
  • Advised in respect of the merits of commencing a further action for copyright infringement following determination of an earlier action concerning the same parties.
  • Advised in respect of patent infringement of a patent concerning a pharmacologically active chemical.
  • Advised a franchisor in respect of claims against ex-franchisees for passing off in relation to the get-up of a retail outlet and breaches of a franchise agreement.
  • Advised on jurisdiction issues in relation to a potential action concerning passing off in the UK and related causes of actions in other EU member states.
  • Advised and drafted particulars of claim in a defamation action against News Group Newspapers T/A The Sun.
  • Advised on the merits of seeking to re-instate a patent application that had been refused and an appeal in respect of the same.
  • Advised in respect of a cease and desist letter concerning allegations of trade mark infringement.
  • Drafted particulars of claim on behalf of a franchisor in a case involving trade mark infringement and passing off.
  • Drafted particulars of claim on behalf of a film director concerning copyright ownership of the film footage.
• Legal professionals

  Legal professionals

  Robert’s professional negligence practice centres on solicitor negligence cases and he has particular expertise in dealing with the issues that come up in property transactions. In addition to being instructed on numerous multi-claimant £multi-million actions concerning the professional negligence of solicitors acting for the purchasers of “off plan” property developments, he also handles a wide variety of conveyancing related professional negligence claims against solicitor and surveyors including advice concerning stamp duty mitigation schemes and advice concerning leases e.g. break clauses.

  Robert’s intellectual property and personal injury expertise means that he is also well placed to handle professional negligence claims in both areas, involving solicitors, patent & trade mark attorneys and other professionals.

  Recent Work:

  • Haider Kennedy Solicitors v Momson (2017): successfully resisted the solicitor’s firm’s application to appeal against a refusal of relief from sanctions where the appellant had failed to comply with an unless order, having allegedly been one day late.
  • Sanam Khawaja & Ors v (1) Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj (2) LVI (2014): successfully resisted the solicitors’ application to come off the record in a personal injury claim where the claimant would have lost the benefit of her insurance cover if the solicitor ceased acting before the insurer gave consent for a new solicitor to act on her behalf.
  • Stockdale & Reid Ltd. v (1) Darren Ellison (2) Patricia Murray (2016): obtained a substantial settlement prior to Judgment being handed down in a case where the solicitor’s alleged failure to advise his client to accept the defendant’s offer in a neighbour boundary dispute had resulted in the client losing the land subject to the dispute due to the size of the adverse costs order.
  • Advised in an action involving multiple claimants where the solicitor is alleged to have paid out monies to the property developer in breach of the escrow conditions.
  • Advised in an action involving multiple claimants where the solicitor allegedly wrongly advised as to the suitability of an insurance bond that was supposed to protect the claimants’ deposits in the event that the developer failed to complete the development.
  • Advised in an action involving multiple claimants where the solicitor allegedly acted in breach in trust in paying a high percentage of the deposits for an “off plan” property development to referrers without the claimant’s knowledge.
  • Substantial settlement arising out of a property conveyancer failing to follow the client’s instructions that resulted in the developer pulling out of the transaction after the deadline to exchange had expired.
  • Settlement achieved in cases where the purchaser’s solicitor had promoted the use of stamp duty mitigation schemes that were deemed to have failed with a resulting tax liability to the purchasers.
  • Settlement achieved in a case where the solicitor was alleged to have failed to have obtained adequate ATE insurance.
• Insurance funded disputes

  Insurance funded disputes

  Robert is regularly involved in claims involving insurers.  Please see the CDR, Professional Liability and Personal Injury sections of his profile for further details.