“Catherine is a real superstar. She is incredibly good on her feet. She is a really robust advocate with fantastic client-handling skills and produces excellent written work.”
Chambers UK
Catherine (Cat) is a successful commercial and insurance specialist with a particular focus on construction and engineering disputes, property damage and professional liability. She took silk at an early stage in her career (2023) and continues to have a busy court and adjudication practice.
In consistent high demand from insurers, contractors, employers, construction professionals and insolvency practitioners, Catherine has an incredible rate of retention of clients, which shows that not only is she committed to fighting her client’s case to ensure a positive outcome, but that she is personable and works well as part of the team. Her written and oral advocacy is excellent and regularly commended by clients, achieving outcomes either better than or in line with her early-stage advice.
Catherine is called to the bar in England and Wales and also in Northern Ireland. Whilst Catherine spends most of her time by the sea on the north coast of Northern Ireland, she is regularly back in London.
Catherine appears in all levels of tribunal in procedural applications, substantive hearings and trials. Catherine has appeared in all of the TCCs and acted in adjudications and mediations. Catherine is not only instructed when a dispute has arisen but, as a result of the rapport she builds with her clients, she is often asked to advise clients when they believe a dispute may be about to arise to assist in an understanding of the merits and adopting a strategic approach to resolution.
Catherine is “innovative and commercially minded” and has a client focused and commercial approach to resolving disputes, giving “good, practical advice”. She effectively manages the legal, expert and client teams to achieve the most favourable outcome for her clients. She is described by her clients as “exceptional”. Her clients have also commented that “her advocacy is outstanding and she’s always a pleasure to work with.” Chambers UK describes her as having a “great strategic mind” and “proactive,brilliant with clients and gives no-nonsense advice."
Catherine was shortlisted for “Best Woman in Construction Law” by the Women in Construction and Engineering Awards and won Construction Junior Barrister of the Year at the Chambers UK Bar Awards 2019 before taking silk.
Catherine loves nothing more than family walks by the sea, even if they involve carrying heavy toddlers! Catherine is incredibly proud of her northern roots and is often back in Lancashire visiting family and friends.
As Catherine’s core practice area is construction and engineering, she is regularly instructed in adjudications for both referring and responding parties. Catherine has experience in substantial, as well as small but significant, final account disputes, technical payment disputes, substantial professional negligence claims, defect claims and delay and disruption claims.
Catherine is particularly skilled at leading the client, expert and legal team to produce the required material in the short time available, without compromising on the depth of analysis or technical detail required to achieve a successful outcome.
Recent Work:
Leading Louis Zvesper and Simon Kerry in relation to a c£40m dispute concerning delay and disruption to the construction of a central London office block, reported to be one of the most complex construction sites in London.
Representing engineers in relation to a c£20m professional negligence adjudication concerning the conversion of a former fire station into a mixed-use site, housing a school, recreation and sports facilities and residential properties.
Representing a subcontractor in a multi-million pound final account dispute in relation to a landmark London development, which involved the full range of issues including contract interpretation and claims for variation, delay, loss and expense and liquidated damages. Catherine succeeded in proving her client was entitled to a substantial further payment.
Representing a main contractor in a c£9m claim against its structural engineering subcontractor in relation to defective design and construction works to a care home, which resulted in the site being closed due to safety concerns.
Representing an employer in successfully resisting a claim for payment pursuant to payment notices which Catherine persuaded the Adjudicator were invalid.
Representing a firm of professional consultants and their insurers in relation to a multi-million pound professional negligence claim as to the design and contract administration services provided in respect of works to a Grade II listed building. The Referring Party discontinued the adjudication after receiving the Response.
Representing a subcontractor in relation to a notice-based payment dispute, recovering substantial sums due for works carried out to a major London development.
Representing a charity (employer) in relation to a c£2.5m final account dispute concerning the construction of a world class sports facility.
Representing a subcontractor in relation to a breach of contract claim concerning the installation of a specialist roof to a school. The Referring Party discontinued the adjudication after receiving the Response.
Catherine’s core practice is in construction and engineering disputes, and she is recognised as leading counsel in this field by Chambers UK, Chambers Global and Legal 500. She regularly acts in cases concerning defective works, payment disputes, final account disputes and prolongation claims as well as professional negligence claims made by and against construction professionals.
Catherine excels at understanding and analysing the technical aspects of such claims, in order to provide an appropriate strategy for the case designed to achieve the best outcome for her clients. Catherine acts for contractors, employers, subcontractors, construction professionals and their insurers and has also acted for insolvency professionals in relation to construction disputes.
Recent Work:
Representing an external wall contractor in relation to cladding claims valued at c£500m.
Defending structural engineers in relation to defects in the engineering design of three apartment blocks in Salford. A large part of the claim was dependent on the alleged delay caused by the design defect. Catherine succeeded in defending the entirety of the delay claim, reducing the overall value of the claim from c£20m to less than £5m at trial (Irwell Riverside v Arcadis).
Representing an external wall contractor in a payment dispute concerning 38 contracts where the value of the works was £14m. Successful at contested applications and trial, with indemnity costs awarded (Everwarm v BN Rendering).
Representing the building owners in relation to a claim regarding defective cladding against New Home Warranty provider and developer. Successfully defended strike out application by developer on limitation grounds, establishing limitation period applicable to concealment claim where concealment only discovered after normal period expired.
Representing the cladding sub-contractor in a claim brought by Premier Inn Hotels against the main contractor who had, in turn, issued additional claims against the project team. (Premier Inn Hotels Limited v McAleer & Rushe Limited v KTD Facades Limited and others)
Representing the refrigeration contractor in relation to a £32m claim concerning the alleged defective installation of refrigeration equipment in an abattoir (Morrisons v Lorien and others). The claim settled on favourable terms shortly before trial.
Representing the leaseholders of a residential building in a claim against the contractor that the construction of the property did not comply with building regulations and was unfit for habitation. Favourable settlement achieved at mediation, enabling repayment to be made to the BSF.
Advising a property developer in relation to claims made by the residents of a block flats concerning a range of issues alleged to have resulted in the flats being uninhabitable under the Defective Premises Act (The Residents and Management Company of Herons Court v Heronslea Limited and others).
Representing a specialist sub-contractor in relation to the installation of a high-pressure water mist system in the basement of the Houses of Parliament (The Corporate Officer of the House of Commons and House of Lords v CBRE Managed Services Limited v Marioff).
Representing structural engineers in relation to a claim for defective design and construction of the structural steel to a hotel, which allegedly resulted in masonry falling causing personal injuries (Shepherd Construction Limited v Billington Construction Limited).
Representing a subcontractor in relation to a multi-million pound claim concerning the construction of hardstanding at a major car manufacturer’s premises (Volvo v Lindum v Breheny).
Advising the main contractor in relation to adjudication and arbitration proceedings in which a subcontractor was claiming £3.5m in relation to the construction of a temporary dock facility.
Representing a charity in relation to c£2.5m final account dispute concerning the construction of a world class standard sports centre.
Acting for the employer in relation to a substantial claim for liquidated damages arising out of the delayed construction of a high-end residential property.
Acting as junior counsel for an employer in relation to a c£32m recovery claim against the project team arising out of damage to the party wall with a neighbouring property during the course of construction works.
Acting as junior counsel in litigation concerning the defective construction of a major road in Wales (UK Highways A55 Ltd v Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd [2012] EWHC 3505 (TCC)). The case also provides guidance to as to the consequence of staying proceedings on the time for service of the Particulars of Claim.
Successfully represented the contractor in the leading case on the definition of “residential occupier” in Westfield Construction Limited v Clive Lewis [2013] EWHC 376.
Representing and advising a liquidator in seeking to recover monies due to an insolvent contractor in relation to a number of construction projects.
Defending a major national housebuilder in relation to a claim concerning defective works and sewage contamination.
Catherine is also a contributor to Construction All Risks Insurance (2014, Sweet & Maxwell) and a contributor to the Practical Law Construction Blog.
As a result of her busy construction practice, Catherine is regularly involved in arbitrations involving construction and insurance disputes.
Recent Work:
Successfully acted for the insured in relation to a coverage dispute concerning the construction of a substantial sewer. The claim concerned the proper interpretation of LEG3.
Representing a high net worth individual in a £10m+ professional negligence claim against his architect for failing to obtain planning permission in relation to substantial renovation works to two very high end, listed properties.
Advising a main contractor in relation to recovery of substantial sums from a structural engineer (and its insurers) for defective works to a care home, rendering it structurally unsafe.
Advising the main contractor in relation to adjudication and arbitration proceedings in which a subcontractor was claiming substantial sums in relation to the construction of a temporary dock facility.
Acting on behalf of homeowners in relation to defects in the construction of their new home, in particular concerning the ventilation system.
Advising a homeowner in relation to arbitration proceedings concerning the defective tiling installation to their high-end property.
Advising insolvency professionals of a main contractor in relation to a series of arbitration claims made by different employers.
As a result of her reputation and excellent understanding of technical issues in construction claims, Catherine is regularly instructed at an early stage to advise on and act in claims concerning damage caused by fire, floods, leaks and explosions. She is then able to lead on the strategy to ensure a successful outcome.
Catherine’s clients include insurers, property owners and contractors. As a result, she is well placed to understand all possible sides of the litigation, ensuring she is able to provide the best advice to her clients from initial instruction and all the way through to trial.
Recent Work:
Successfully defended structural engineers in relation to a multi-million pound claim concerning water damage to modules stored pending installation on apartment blocks.
Acting for insurers in relation to a substantial claim concerning water damage to museum property following completion of renovation works.
Acting on behalf of a facilities and maintenance contractor in respect of proceedings issued by ITV concerning the defective installation of a generator, causing smoke damage and a power outage.
Representing a piling subcontractor alleged to have caused damage to a sewer which, in turn, caused property damage.
Advising a train manufacturer in relation to the recovery of damages for remedial works necessary to a train following a fire caused by defective engineering works.
Advising the owners of an energy waste plant in relation to a multi-million pound fire damage claim.
Advising a homeowner and their insurers in relation to a multi-million pound claim concerning damage caused by repeated sewerage leaks.
Advising the owner of a warehouse in respect of property damage caused following the explosion of a roller during treatment works.
Advising a college in relation to fire damage caused by the installation of solar panels during the construction of a further education building.
Advising a major high street pharmaceutical store in relation to a fire damage originating from a cosmetics stand.
Advising a plumbing subcontractor in relation to substantial water damage following a repair to pipework.
Advising a homeowner in relation to a potential claim following an extensive fire emanating from a boiler which spread to a neighbouring property.
Acting for a drainage contractor alleged to have caused an escape of sewage at a luxury Mayfair property causing the extensive property damage.
Acting for insurers in relation to a flood damage claim in respect of a residential property.
As a result of her construction, professional negligence and property damage work, Catherine acts for insurers and insureds in complex insurance disputes, primarily in relation to PI and CAR policies. She is sought after by clients for her clear and practical advice.
Catherine’s Construction, Professional Negligence and Property Damage profiles outline her extensive experience of construction and engineering claims, many of which involve insurers. The focus of this profile is on coverage disputes.
Catherine is a member of Gatehouse Chambers’ Insurance Team Steering Committee and organises insurance-related events in chambers.
Recent Work:
Advising insurers in relation to a coverage dispute concerning late notification, delayed declinature and estoppel.
Advising insurers in relation to whether claims under the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 concerning allegedly defective works to new student accommodation have been properly notified under a CAR policy.
Successfully acted for an insured JV and statutory undertaker in relation to a claim to be indemnified under a CAR Policy. Insurers’ attempt to rely on LEG3 to decline most of the claim was unsuccessful at trial.
Advising insurers in relation to a claim under a CAR policy to determine whether water ingress which damaged both the works and valuable property is covered by the policy and whether cover extends to the main contractor.
Successfully acted for the main contractor and insurers at trial in recovering an indemnity under the insolvent subcontractor’s PI policy, effectively enforcing an adjudicator’s award.
Led by Michael Wheater KC, Catherine acted for consulting engineers in relation to a claim by the RFU in which the contractor claimed to be a co-insured under the CAR policy and, therefore, had no liability in contribution to Catherine’s client (RFU v FMC). Catherine withdrew from the case before the hearing in the Court of Appeal as she was elevated to silk.
Successfully represented an insured in obtaining an indemnity under a PI policy despite insurers’ allegation that Catherine’s client had breached its duty of fair presentation.
Representing insurers who provided new home warranty policies in respect of a block of flats in relation to a multi-million pound claim proceeding through the TCC.
Advising freeholders, leaseholders, managing agents and local authorities in relation to claims under new home warranty policies.
Advising insurers in relation to recovering sums from an insolvent, but potentially insured, subcontractor.
Advising an insurer of residential property as to the obligation to act promptly and the indemnity cap for providing alternative accommodation.
Advising a contractor’s professional indemnity insurers in relation to claims made for defective design, workmanship and personal injury.
Advising insurers in relation to defect claims by homeowners under new home warranty policies.
Catherine was a contributor to Construction All Risks Insurance (2014, Sweet & Maxwell).
Catherine regularly acts in professional negligence disputes concerning architects, contract administrators, quantity surveyors, project managers and structural engineers in all aspects of professional negligence claims against construction professionals, including cases concerning negligent design, overvaluation of works, inadequate contract administration and failure to inspect/supervise.
Catherine accepts instructions directly from clients and insurers regarding subrogated claims. She provides advice, drafts protocol letters and pleadings as well as representing clients in court.
Her recent work includes:
Representing an external wall contractor in negligence claims arising out of the use of ACM cladding valued at c£500m.
Defending structural engineers in relation to defects in the engineering design of three apartment blocks in Salford (Irwell Riverside v Arcadis).
Representing an acoustic consultant in a multi-million pound negligence claim concerning alleged inadequacies in the acoustic design of student accommodation being constructed above a nightclub.
Representing the refrigeration contractor in relation to a £32m claim concerning the alleged defective installation of refrigeration equipment in an abattoir (Morrisons v Lorien and others). The claim settled on favourable terms shortly before trial.
Representing the cladding sub-contractor in a claim brought by Premier Inn Hotels against the main contractor who had, in turn, issued additional claims against the project team. (Premier Inn Hotels Limited v McAleer & Rushe Limited v KTD Facades Limited and others)
Representing engineers in relation to a c£20m professional negligence adjudication concerning the conversion of a former fire station into a mixed-use site, housing a school, recreation and sports facilities and residential properties. The claim settled on favourable terms shortly prior to the decision being issued.
Representing the main contractor in a c£9m claim against its structural engineering subcontractor in relation to defective design and construction works to the roof of a care home, which resulted in the site being closed due to safety concerns.
Representing the M&E designer in a multimillion-pound claim brought by Southend Hospital concerned allegations of negligent design (Southend Hospital v WSP and others)
Defending a claim brought against a structural engineer concerning allegedly defective designs provided in respect of a housing development (Sansom v Bentley Design).
Defending a contract administrator in relation to professional negligence allegations relating to overvaluing works and failing to identify defective works.
Defending a project manager in relation to a professional negligence claim concerning the failure to ensure the contractor had suitable insurance in place and to obtain collateral warranties. The Claimant discontinued its claim following service of the Defence drafted by Catherine (Camperman v Cube).
Defending an architect in relation to allegations of negligent design of a substantial residential property (Lloyd v Blair).
Defending an architect in relation to the alleged negligent design of a heating system and the alleged inadequate supervision of the works (Victoria House Properties v ARH).
Defending a consultant contract administrator and quantity surveyor in relation to alleged negligent services provided during the course of the renovation of a heritage property. The employer discontinued the adjudication following service of the Response drafted by Catherine.
Defending a solicitor in relation to allegations of professional negligence, conflict of interest and breach of fiduciary duty.
Defending a solicitor in relation to the failure to advise a client as to the value of a charging order over a freehold property which was subject to a long lease.
Acting for a lender in relation to a breach of warranty of authority claim against a prominent firm of solicitors.
Catherine acts for professional indemnity insurers primarily in relation to claims against construction professionals. However, Catherine also has experience in claims against other professionals, including solicitors and valuers.
Catherine advises on coverage issues in relation to various consumer, commercial and reinsurance policies.
Recent Work:
Advising insurers in relation to a coverage dispute concerning late notification, delayed declinature and estoppel.
Advising insurers in relation to whether claims under the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 concerning allegedly defective works to new student accommodation have been properly notified under a CAR policy.
Successfully acted for the main contractor and insurers at trial in recovering an indemnity under the insolvent subcontractor’s PI policy, effectively enforcing an adjudicator’s award.
Led by Michael Wheater KC, Catherine acted for consulting engineers in relation to a claim by the RFU in which the contractor claimed to be a co-insured under the CAR policy and, therefore, had no liability in contribution to Catherine’s client (RFU v FMC).
Successfully represented an insured in obtaining an indemnity under a PI policy despite insurers’ allegation that Catherine’s client had breached its duty of fair presentation.
Representing insurers who provided new home warranty policies in respect of a block of flats in relation to a multi-million pound claim proceeding through the TCC.
Advising insolvency practitioners in relation to a claim against insurers for the destruction of an energy waste plant caused by a fire.
Advising insurers in relation to seeking to recover a payment made to an insured which was also paid by an insurer to its subcontractor that caused the damage, but such payment was not passed on before the subcontractor became insolvent.
Advising on quantum issues in respect of business interruption, loss of stock and property damage.
Assisting in a coverage dispute in respect of motor insurance arising as a result of modifications made to the vehicle and incorrect answers on the Proposal Form.
Catherine regularly acts in relation to disputes involving insurers, details of which can be found in the Construction, Professional Liability and CDR sections of her profile.
As a result of Catherine’s extensive experience of analysing, interpreting and advising on lengthy construction contracts, she is regularly instructed to advise individuals, companies, lenders and funders in relation to the governing contractual rights and obligations in broader commercial matters.
Recent Work:
She was recently instructed by a funder in relation to stakeholder proceedings in the Commercial Court concerning sums due under a debenture, where proceedings had already been issued by a lender pursuant to its receivables finance agreement.
She also acted for a company in relation to a dispute under an aircraft management agreement in the Mercantile Court.
Catherine has particular knowledge of the finance documents involved in lending and share sale agreements as a result of her time with the finance team of a major US law firm.
Professional associations
COMBAR
TecBar
SCL
Adjudication Society
British Insurance Law Association
Society of Construction Law
Publications
Contributor to Construction All Risks Insurance, published by Sweet & Maxwell.
Qualifications
LLM European Law (University of Nottingham)
BA (Hons) Jurisprudence (University of Oxford, St. Catherine’s College)
Bar Vocational Course
Lord Astbury Scholar, Middle Temple
Recommendations
Catherine is recommended by Chambers UK, Chambers Global, Who’s Who Legal and Legal 500 as a leading junior in construction and professional negligence. She is also recommended by Chambers UK for property damage. She won Junior Construction Barrister of the Year at the Chambers UK 2019 Awards.
Construction:
“A talented and able advocate.” (The Legal 500, 2024, Construction)
“Her advocacy is outstanding and she’s always a pleasure to work with.” (Chambers and Partners 2024, Construction)
“A real star. Her written work is excellent and she doesn’t miss a beat. She’s clear, concise and robust in her analysis. She’s an incredibly strong advocate and she works incredibly hard.” (Chambers and Partners 2024, Construction)
“She is clear, concise and robust in her analysis and she works incredibly hard.” (Chambers and Partners 2024, Professional Negligence: Technology & Construction)
“She provides creative solutions to legal problems.” “An incredibly able junior and forceful advocate whose written work is fantastic.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“Catherine works well under pressure.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“She understands commercial issues, not just legal issues.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“Catherine has a good feel for construction work; she’s at the forefront of limitation issues and does well there.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“She is incredibly able and very good on technical things.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“An excellent senior junior. She’s very easy to work with and understands commercial issues, not just the legal issues.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“She’s excellent to work with, is always engaged with the issues; her pleading work is excellent as is her advocacy.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“A fantastic, committed, brilliant and clever all-rounder.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“Catherine is a real superstar in the making. She is incredibly good on her feet. She is a really robust advocate with fantastic client-handling skills and produces excellent written work.” (Chambers UK, 2023)
“Her great legal analysis is couched in a commercial context. Catherine is an all-round top-class junior.”
“Catherine has a sensible commercial outlook, understands the goals of the client, and is a good advocate.” (The Legal 500, 2023)
“A rising star in construction law – catch her while you can” (Chambers UK)
“She is incredibly intelligent and able to get to the heart of a claim quickly.” (Legal 500)
“She is extremely approachable, knowledgeable and a persuasive advocate.” (Chambers UK)
“She has a great strategic mind and works phenomenally hard, and is as charismatic as she is hard-working.” (Chambers UK)
“Catherine Piercy is excellent. She is proactive, brilliant with clients and gives no-nonsense advice.” (Chambers UK)
“Able to think quickly on her feet and offer strategic advice” (Legal 500)
“Very hard-working and enthusiastic,” she “understands both the law and the industry.” (Chambers UK)
“She is very quick and thorough and really grasps construction-specific disputes.” (Chambers UK)
“Fights really hard for her clients and works incredibly hard. She’s an excellent advocate who produces top-notch written work.” (Chambers UK)
‘Simply exceptional: very bright, understands complicated technical issues and is very good at cross-examination.’ (Legal 500)
“An outstanding advocate who is resolute and remarkable in leading a long-term strategy.” (Legal 500)
“Her written work is top class…She is very commanding and highly effective when dealing with clients and the other side.” (Chambers Global)
“An extremely hard worker who always comes up with helpful, pragmatic advice.” (Chambers UK)
Professional negligence
“Catherine is well liked by clients, for good reason. She is able to explain complex legal arguments clearly to lay clients and help them understand the relative merits of the same, which is invaluable for them to make informed commercial decisions.” (The Legal 500, Professional Negligence)
“Catherine is an excellent junior. Her written work is first class, her analysis is always spot on and she is an excellent advocate.” (The Legal 500, 2023)
“She has a quick grasp of technical claims, a great client manner and is strong on her feet in court.” – (Legal 500)
“She rolls her sleeves up and clients really like her. She’s down to earth and user-friendly, with good attention to detail and the ability to make points clearly.” (Chambers UK)
“Very robust and technically excellent.” (Legal 500)
“Her written work is very good and she is known as a strong advocate.” (Chambers UK)
“Impressive.” (Legal 500)
“‘She has very strong communication skills that inspire confidence and bring a positive energy to the room.” (Legal 500)
Property damage
“Catherine Piercy is very passionate about the cases she takes and she really gets stuck in and gives it her all. She’s also very good technically and over the detail – you are in it together with her. She’s a pleasure to work with.” (Chambers and Partners 2024, Property Damage)
“She is brilliant – super smart and super on top of it. She is an excellent barrister all round” (Chambers UK)
“She’s exceptionally hard-working and great with clients.” (Chambers UK)
“Bright, hard-working and responsive.” (Chambers UK)
“Her written work is brilliant and she’s incredibly good with clients.” (Chambers UK)
“Very clever and down-to-earth.” (Chambers UK)
“Clever, incredibly industrious, very easy to work with and utterly reliable.” (Chambers UK)
“She’s very bright, very accommodating, and very good with clients. Both her writing and advocacy skills are impressive.” (Chambers UK)
Insights
Success in Chambers Global 2025
14/02/2025
Gatehouse Chambers featured in Chambers and Partners’ Insurance Litigation Guide
21/10/2024
Chambers Global 2024
15/02/2024
David Pliener and Catherine Piercy recommended for Silk
23/12/2022
Gatehouse barristers succeed in major new coinsurance decision
03/05/2022
Gatehouse Chambers makes a strong showing in the Chambers Global 2022 Guide
17/02/2022
The words are mine, and mine alone (or so my lawyer told me)
22/12/2021
Hardwicke Celebrates International Women’s Day 2021
08/03/2021
Hardwicke sees multiple cases in The Lawyer’s Top 20 cases for 2021
08/02/2021
Arbitration v Expert Determination: what are the relative merits?
21/05/2020
Past events
Adjudication Day (North) Manchester
05/02/2025
Insurance Brew: I have to tell them as well? Notification and excess layer insurers
30/01/2025
A key ally or a chink in your armour? The role of brokers in placing policies and making claims
07/10/2024
SCL Reading’s Lunchtime Seminar: Keeping an eye on the Court – important recent adjudication cases
22/05/2024
Adjudication Day 2024
28/02/2024
SCL Northern Ireland: Construction Adjudication Update
16/02/2024
Behind the Façade Series: Constructing the claim: what are the issues in making claims against the project team?
05/05/2022
Behind the Façade Series Webinar: Avenues of redress for landlords and tenants part II: non-service charge related solutions
24/02/2022
RICS: a construction legal update
16/12/2021
Videos
Insurance Brew: I have to tell them as well? Notification and excess layer insurers
27/02/2025
Behind the Façade Webinar: Constructing the claim: what are the issues in making claims against the project team?
05/05/2022
Behind the Façade Series Webinar: Avenues of redress for landlords and tenants part II: non-service charge related solutions
24/02/2022
Let’s be professional about this
12/02/2020
Custom PDF
Which sections would you like to include in your PDF download?
X
Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
We use cookies to optimise our website and our service.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
